The Technical Archaeologist

Tracing the legacy of old computer systems from mainframes to that BS angular app you built in…

Follow publication

Member-only story

Programming Paradigms as Language Destiny

Why do some programming languages feel neat and orderly and others seem loaded with inconsistencies?

Technology vector created by artmonkey

When I first started trying to write my own programming language I was surprised by how difficult it seemed to be to find best practices on language design. In an industry filled with opinions, where people will fight to the death over tabs -vs- spaces, there isn’t much guidance for would-be program language designers.

Eventually I came to my own conclusions: the pathway to success with program language design is to think of programming paradigms as logical groupings of abstractions and be as intentional about what is included and what isn’t.

What Is a Programming Paradigm?

A programming paradigm can be thought of as a philosophy of structuring and executing code. Unlike styles and conventions, paradigms cannot be leveraged unless they are built into the design of the language. You probably already know many programming paradigms:

  • Object-orientated programming
  • Functional programming
  • Procedural programming

Then there are some more obscure ones you might not know about:

  • Logical programming
  • Agent-orientated programming

Create an account to read the full story.

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

The Technical Archaeologist
The Technical Archaeologist

Published in The Technical Archaeologist

Tracing the legacy of old computer systems from mainframes to that BS angular app you built in 2005. Retro computer art by macrovector courtesy of freepik.com

Marianne Bellotti
Marianne Bellotti

Written by Marianne Bellotti

Author of Kill It with Fire Manage Aging Computer Systems (and Future Proof Modern Ones)

Responses (4)